Climate-Induced Community Relocations: Creating an Adaptive Governance Framework Based in Human Rights Doctrine

Robin Bronen

English: Eagle, AK, July 27, 2009 -- Don and J...

English: Eagle, AK, July 27, 2009 — Don and Judy Mann’s house in Eagle, Alaska was pushed 300 feet off of its foundation by ice and flood waters. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Climate change and the ecological alterations that result will cause millions of people to flee their homes.  This humanitarian crisis is occurring with unprecedented rapidity in the Arctic, where  rising temperatures, loss of arctic sea ice, thawing permafrost  have impacted  the 200 indigenous communities that have lived there for millennia.  Disaster relief and hazard migration have been the traditional humanitarian responses to extreme environmental events.  Yet government agencies are no longer able to protect communities despite spending millions of dollars on erosion control and flood relief.  Because there may be no way to quickly reverse the harm caused by climate change, community relocation may be the only immediate and permanent solution to protect people facing climate-induced ecological change.

This article provides an overview of the climate-induced ecological changes occurring in Alaska and an analysis of the post-disaster recovery and hazard migration laws that define the current humanitarian response to extreme weather events in the United States.  The author argues that these laws fail to address environmental disasters that occur gradually and require relocation and have, in fact, impeded efforts to relocate communities.  The article describes the unprecedented social and ecological crisis climate change has caused in Newtok, an Alaskan indigenous community that has resolved to relocate.  Ultimately, the article proposes the enactment of an adaptive governance framework based in human rights doctrine to protect people residing in communities threatened by climate change.  This framework will allow government agencies to transition their humanitarian response from protection in place to community relocation.

View full text (PDF)

Inadequate Discipline: Challenging Zero Tolerance Policies as Violating State Constitution Education Clauses

Emily Bloomenthal

 

Empty classroom

View full text (PDF)

A Wholesome Rule of Law: Corruption and Contract Law in the 19th Century

Zephyr Teachout

 

 

In Citizens United, the Court appeared to shut the door on legislative efforts to curtail undue corporate political influence by holding that only quid pro quo corruption could justify campaign finance regulation that infringed on First Amendment. However, the Court’s holding only addresses the unconstitutionality of criminal sanctions for corporate political speech.

Citizens United

Citizens United (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

This article considers a path left open by that analysis: using contract law rather than criminal law minimize corruption.  Professor Teachout turns to a line of nineteenth century cases in which courts decide that public policy demands the non-enforcement of contracts whose underlying bargain is corrupt.  Teachout examines four cases in which courts utilize a broad view of corruption that looked beyond the mere exchange of cash for votes.

 

 

These nineteenth century cases remind us that the judiciary can and should take an active role in resisting undue influence as a form of corruption. This article suggests that contract law and the non-enforcement of corrupt contracts may be an effective way to limit undue corporate influence on elections without running afoul of Citizens United.

 

 

View Complete Article (PDF)

 

 

Electoral “Exceptionalism” and the First Amendment: A Road Paved with Good Intentions

Geoffrey R. Stone

View full text (PDF)

%d bloggers like this: