Ann Coulter’s ‘Retard’ Tweet Perpetuates Ignorance, Unites Advocates

by Marissa Cohen

This article was published on Mashable.com and is reprinted here with the author’s permission. To view the full article, please visit: http://mashable.com/2012/10/25/ann-coulter-op-ed/.

“It only takes six characters to cause an online stir. When Ann Coulter clicked the blue tweet button on her computer screen during Monday night’s presidential debate, she instantly generated a waterfall of controversy.

“She wrote, ‘I highly approve of Romney’s decision to be kind and gentle to the retard,’ in reference to President Obama, a sentiment she instantaneously communicated to her 269,024 Twitter followers and well beyond.

 

…

“Imagine an equally hurtful yet contained situation: You use the word ‘retard’ when talking with a friend in a coffee shop. However, you quickly notice a visibly mentally handicapped person within earshot. My guess is you would feel ashamed. You would slink away, go back to your job, your home or your coffee, and continue on with your life. The person who overheard your conversation may be too stunned, disempowered or incapable of calling your attention to the sting you caused in that moment, to the damage you perpetuated with the pejorative use of the word ‘retard.’ He may slink back, reminded that he is different, pained that he is the butt of another stranger’s joke. The damage would be done, but the moment would pass.

“Thanks to Twitter and other social media outlets, Ann Coulter’s moment will not pass so easily. Her voice was projected through the Twitter megaphone. Her words reached the mentally handicapped individuals who she verbally assaulted, as well as their friends, family members, teachers and advocates. Their eyes fell on Coulter’s hateful words when they checked their social media accounts that night.

“But the same online platform that hosts Coulter’s hateful rhetoric also allows us — those who fight for the special needs community — to respond. We can educate about a word many are sophisticated enough to avoid, but not informed enough to fully understand.

…

“I hope that in light of this week’s Twitter scandal, we remind ourselves that, with the click of a button, our words are not just stored on a webpage but also felt in the lives of real people. That said, if you must join the online counterattack against Ann Coulter, I urge you to at least consult a thesaurus. ‘Fool,’ ‘buffoon,’ maybe ‘dimwit’ — but please, not retard.”

Marissa Cohen is the 2012-13 Alumnae Coordinator for the Review of Law & Social Change. She has helped provide civil legal services to individuals with special needs and has a Masters in teaching with a concentration in students with disabilities.

Janet Benshoof

Janet Benshoof is the President of the Global Justice Center and an expert in constitutional and human rights law. She spearheaded the first use of international law to prosecute rape by the Iraqi High Tribunal, established US Supreme Court precedents on religious liberty and reproductive rights, and obtained the first US approval of emergency contraception. Ms. Benshoof advises governments, women leaders, judges, and the UN on international law such as CEDAW, the Rome Statute for the ICC, the Geneva Conventions and on Security Council Resolutions. She is currently advising Burmese groups on the legality of Burma’s constitution, and working to ensure the rights of victims of rape in armed conflicts under the Geneva Conventions.

Ms. Benshoof, who previously founded the Center for Reproductive Rights, has been singled out as one of top 100 lawyers in the U.S., has received a MacArthur fellowship, and publishes extensively in law journals and popular media.

Ms. Benshoof is the author of U.S. Ratification of CEDAW: An Opportunity to Radically Reframe the Right to Equality Accorded Women Under the U.S. Constitution.

Rachel Maddow interviews Olson and Boies

The ICE Storm in U.S. Homes: An Urgent Call for Policy Change

Katherine Evans

Since its creation in 2003, the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has used increasingly aggressive tactics to enforce U.S. immigration law. One of ICE’s most prominent enforcement initiatives is its practice of raiding the homes of immigrants. Accounts of home raids from victims all over the country reveal a pattern of practice that differs widely from ICE’s official statements regarding raids. This paper establishes that although immigration officials are governed by the Fourth Amendment when conducting home raids, ICE’s agents nonetheless regularly violate the Constitution when carrying out home raids. Additionally, this paper argues that the number and nature of these constitutional violations, combined with the social costs of the raids, present a compelling case for policy change. The paper concludes with a series of policy proposals that would rectify the profound invasions of privacy and degrading treatment many immigrants in this country are currently experiencing.