The Harbinger
OUR SECOND ISSUE:
East Ramapo: A School District In Need of State Oversight, by Alexis Piazza
Waking Up the Caring Majority: Why We All Need to Care About the Aging of America, by Ai-jen Poo
Making an Impact: An Interview with New Economy Project Attorney Susan Shin, by Susan Shin
Book Excerpt: Kenji Yoshino, Speak Now: Marriage Equality on Trial, by Kenji Yoshino
Justice Is Possible, But You Have to Believe It, by Vince Warren
Leveraging Civil Legal Services: Using Economic Research and Social Impact Bonds to Close the Justice Gap, by Ben Notterman
- Follow N.Y.U. Review of Law and Social Change on WordPress.com
The Third Generation of Indigent Defense Litigation
Cara H. Drinan
Abstract
For years, scholars have documented the national crisis in indigent defense and its many tragic implications, and yet the crisis persists. Traditionally, the appellate and political processes were the exclusive avenues for indigent defense reform, and each suffered from critical infirmities. By the 1970s, individuals and groups began to seek prospective judicial reform of indigent defense systems. Widely used in other arenas, systemic suits based on the Sixth Amendment have been few in number and, at least in their early form, relatively unsuccessful. Other scholars have provided a descriptive account of structural litigation to improve indigent defense, and this article takes those accounts one step further by distilling from the recent body of suits a model for indigent defense litigation. In particular, this article divides suits of this kind into “first generation” and “second generation” suits-a distinction that is largely chronological, but phenomenological to an extent, as well. Firstgeneration suits were reactive and sought limited relief from the courts. In contrast, second-generation suits are marked by their empirical grounding, extensive alliances of support, and requests for sweeping reform. These second-generation suits have been far more successful than their predecessor suits, and this article contends that these suits are emblematic of a model that future suits can replicate. Finally, this article discusses specific issues for litigants of third-generation suits to consider, in particular the pursuit of a federal forum. At the same time, the article recognizes that this type of litigation is neither a panacea nor uniformly available, and the article concludes by offering advice for the individual defense attorney who is working in the midst of a public defense crisis.